Scenario Comparison

Compare Allocation Strategies

Which project mix best advances LifeArc's MND validation and early-detection goals in the current round? These runs use the same observed facts and committee assumptions; only the allocation rule changes.

What The Comparison Says

Read this first, then inspect the charts and tables below.

Highest Milestone Score

Need-Based Allocation

Highest Need Score

Need-Based Allocation

Highest Frontier Score

Need-Based Allocation

Broadest Spread

Equal Allocation Baseline

Allocation By Project

Project-level budget shifts across equal, need-based, frontier, and hybrid scenarios.

Portfolio Score Comparison

Budget-weighted portfolio outputs under the same fixed DEAP formula layer.

Scenario Metrics Table

Budget deployment, concentration, and score comparison across the saved strategy set.

ScenarioStrategyMilestone ScoreNeed ScoreFrontier ScoreQuality ScoreBudget DeployedProjects FundedCapped ProjectsGini
Equal Allocation BaselineEqual Distribution7.517,543.87.56.9£180,000400.00
Need-Based AllocationNeed Adjusted7.719,126.57.66.9£180,000400.17
Frontier AllocationFrontier First7.617,796.27.56.9£180,000400.04
Hybrid Committee ViewHybrid Allocation7.618,269.87.66.9£180,000400.08

Top Ranked Projects

The highest-funded projects per strategy reveal where each rule concentrates the round.

Equal Distribution

MND STaR target validation programme

£45,000

Primer Fund blood test for early MND detection

£45,000

AgriTwin

£45,000

Need Adjusted

MND STaR target validation programme

£62,214

GridPatch

£51,711

AgriTwin

£40,219

Frontier First

GridPatch

£48,300

MND STaR target validation programme

£47,400

Primer Fund blood test for early MND detection

£43,200

Hybrid Allocation

MND STaR target validation programme

£52,828

GridPatch

£48,623

AgriTwin

£41,999