Scenario Execution
Run Scenario Comparisons
Which project mix best advances BioCity's capability-expansion and manufacturing goals under a limited round budget? Run equal, need-based, frontier, and hybrid allocations against that same goal frame.
Choose How To Compare
Use these plain-language definitions before running the numbers.
Need-Based
Allocates in proportion to the DEAP need score, then caps at each project's optimal budget assumption.
Equal Allocation
Acts as the benchmark scenario before differentiation by need, quality, or frontier upside.
Frontier Allocation
Allocates in proportion to the frontier score, usually with stronger concentration in fewer projects.
Hybrid Allocation
Allocates using the DEAP 40/35/25 normalized blend of need, quality, and frontier.
Compare All Four
Best starting point for a new user. It shows how the same preset behaves under equal, need-based, frontier, and hybrid rules.
Scenario Runner
Select a preset and strategy, compute deterministic outputs, and preview portfolio-level consequences before reviewing frozen scenario records.
Saved Scenario Records
Precomputed scenarios stay frozen for comparison, briefing, and audit review.
Equal Distribution
Equal Allocation Baseline
Benchmark scenario that gives every screening-pass project the same base share before optimal-budget caps.
Need Adjusted
Need-Based Allocation
Scenario driven by the need score derived from minimum viable budget, milestone readiness, milestone confidence, and strategic fit.
Frontier First
Frontier Allocation
Scenario driven by the frontier score and therefore more willing to concentrate the round around differentiated upside.
Hybrid Allocation
Hybrid Committee View
Scenario driven by the supplied 40/35/25 hybrid normalization across need, quality, and frontier.