Scenario Comparison

Compare Allocation Strategies

Which project mix best advances BioCity's capability-expansion and manufacturing goals under a limited round budget? These runs use the same observed facts and committee assumptions; only the allocation rule changes.

What The Comparison Says

Read this first, then inspect the charts and tables below.

Highest Milestone Score

Frontier Allocation

Highest Need Score

Need-Based Allocation

Highest Frontier Score

Need-Based Allocation

Broadest Spread

Equal Allocation Baseline

Allocation By Project

Project-level budget shifts across equal, need-based, frontier, and hybrid scenarios.

Portfolio Score Comparison

Budget-weighted portfolio outputs under the same fixed DEAP formula layer.

Scenario Metrics Table

Budget deployment, concentration, and score comparison across the saved strategy set.

ScenarioStrategyMilestone ScoreNeed ScoreFrontier ScoreQuality ScoreBudget DeployedProjects FundedCapped ProjectsGini
Equal Allocation BaselineEqual Distribution8.321,253.37.57.5£130,000300.00
Need-Based AllocationNeed Adjusted8.322,189.77.67.5£130,000300.11
Frontier AllocationFrontier First8.321,527.77.57.5£130,000300.04
Hybrid Committee ViewHybrid Allocation8.321,702.17.57.5£130,000300.05

Top Ranked Projects

The highest-funded projects per strategy reveal where each rule concentrates the round.

Equal Distribution

BioAscent protein production facility

£43,333

BDD OralogiK platform / GMP facility

£43,333

CareRoute

£43,333

Need Adjusted

BioAscent protein production facility

£52,196

BDD OralogiK platform / GMP facility

£46,976

CareRoute

£30,828

Frontier First

BDD OralogiK platform / GMP facility

£46,429

BioAscent protein production facility

£44,397

CareRoute

£39,174

Hybrid Allocation

BioAscent protein production facility

£47,009

BDD OralogiK platform / GMP facility

£45,835

CareRoute

£37,156