Scenario Result
Hybrid Committee View
Scenario driven by the supplied 40/35/25 hybrid normalization across need, quality, and frontier. Recorded by DEAP Crash Demo Operator.
Milestone Score
8.3
Band 7.3-9.2
Need Score
21,702.1
Band 19,221.5-24,182.6
Frontier Score
7.5
Quality 7.5
Budget Deployed
£130,000
0 projects hit their optimal cap
Project Allocation
Hybrid-style redistribution is still capped at each project's optimal budget assumption.
Scenario Notes
This scenario uses the same observed facts and committee assumptions as every other saved run.
Strategy
Hybrid Allocation
Confidence
High
Input-confidence bands are derived from project confidence labels and source types. They are directional uncertainty bands, not probabilistic 95% forecasts.
Capping Rule
Allocations are capped at each project's optimal budget assumption. Any remainder is redistributed across uncapped, screening-pass projects.
Project Results Table
Project-level outputs for this frozen scenario.
| Project | Hub | Allocation | Quality | Milestone | Need | Frontier | Cost-Effectiveness | Weight | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioAscent protein production facility | BioCity Scotland | £47,009 | 7.40 | 8.00 | 25,600 | 7.65 | 0.160 | 36.2% | Hybrid allocation assigns BioAscent protein production facility a normalized weight of 36.2%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption. |
| BDD OralogiK platform / GMP facility | BioCity Scotland | £45,835 | 7.60 | 8.55 | 23,040 | 8.00 | 0.190 | 35.3% | Hybrid allocation assigns BDD OralogiK platform / GMP facility a normalized weight of 35.3%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption. |
| CareRoute | BioCity Scotland | £37,156 | 7.40 | 8.25 | 15,120 | 6.75 | 0.275 | 28.6% | Hybrid allocation assigns CareRoute a normalized weight of 28.6%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption. |
Assumptions Snapshot
These statements explain what is treated as observed versus modelled in the demo.
- 2 project rows are anchored in observed public material; 1 are synthetic comparators used only for committee calibration.
- Observed public stage and public funding facts support the narrative layer.
- Requested budgets, minimum viable budgets, optimal budgets, screening checks, rubric scores, and milestone costs are committee modelling assumptions.
- Quality, milestone, cost-effectiveness, need, frontier, and allocation outputs are deterministic calculations from the DEAP formulas.
- Scenario allocations are capped at each project's optimal budget assumption, and any remainder is redistributed across uncapped projects.