Scenario Result

Hybrid Committee View

Scenario driven by the supplied 40/35/25 hybrid normalization across need, quality, and frontier. Recorded by DEAP Crash Demo Operator.

Milestone Score

7.8

Band 6.5-9.0

Need Score

20,301.5

Band 17,061.4-23,541.6

Frontier Score

7.8

Quality 6.8

Budget Deployed

£220,000

0 projects hit their optimal cap

Project Allocation

Hybrid-style redistribution is still capped at each project's optimal budget assumption.

Scenario Notes

This scenario uses the same observed facts and committee assumptions as every other saved run.

Strategy

Hybrid Allocation

Confidence

High

Input-confidence bands are derived from project confidence labels and source types. They are directional uncertainty bands, not probabilistic 95% forecasts.

Capping Rule

Allocations are capped at each project's optimal budget assumption. Any remainder is redistributed across uncapped, screening-pass projects.

Project Results Table

Project-level outputs for this frozen scenario.

ProjectHubAllocationQualityMilestoneNeedFrontierCost-EffectivenessWeightExplanation
NeuroLensEdinburgh BioQuarter£66,3277.358.3527,7207.900.15230.1%Hybrid allocation assigns NeuroLens a normalized weight of 30.1%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption.
CALCIVIS Imaging SystemEdinburgh BioQuarter£59,2547.257.5522,0507.700.15126.9%Hybrid allocation assigns CALCIVIS Imaging System a normalized weight of 26.9%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption.
SynthBioForgeEdinburgh BioQuarter£50,1786.307.7515,7508.150.11122.8%Hybrid allocation assigns SynthBioForge a normalized weight of 22.8%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption.
Edinburgh Molecular Imaging cancer detection agentsEdinburgh BioQuarter£44,2416.057.2012,0007.600.12020.1%Hybrid allocation assigns Edinburgh Molecular Imaging cancer detection agents a normalized weight of 20.1%, then caps the outcome at the project's optimal budget assumption.

Assumptions Snapshot

These statements explain what is treated as observed versus modelled in the demo.

  • 2 project rows are anchored in observed public material; 2 are synthetic comparators used only for committee calibration.
  • Observed public stage and public funding facts support the narrative layer.
  • Requested budgets, minimum viable budgets, optimal budgets, screening checks, rubric scores, and milestone costs are committee modelling assumptions.
  • Quality, milestone, cost-effectiveness, need, frontier, and allocation outputs are deterministic calculations from the DEAP formulas.
  • Scenario allocations are capped at each project's optimal budget assumption, and any remainder is redistributed across uncapped projects.