Scenario Comparison

Compare Allocation Strategies

Which project mix best advances BioQuarter's imaging and diagnostic translation goals inside a constrained committee round? These runs use the same observed facts and committee assumptions; only the allocation rule changes.

What The Comparison Says

Read this first, then inspect the charts and tables below.

Highest Milestone Score

Need-Based Allocation

Highest Need Score

Need-Based Allocation

Highest Frontier Score

Need-Based Allocation

Broadest Spread

Equal Allocation Baseline

Allocation By Project

Project-level budget shifts across equal, need-based, frontier, and hybrid scenarios.

Portfolio Score Comparison

Budget-weighted portfolio outputs under the same fixed DEAP formula layer.

Scenario Metrics Table

Budget deployment, concentration, and score comparison across the saved strategy set.

ScenarioStrategyMilestone ScoreNeed ScoreFrontier ScoreQuality ScoreBudget DeployedProjects FundedCapped ProjectsGini
Equal Allocation BaselineEqual Distribution7.719,380.07.86.7£220,000400.00
Need-Based AllocationNeed Adjusted7.821,241.87.86.9£220,000400.17
Frontier AllocationFrontier First7.719,404.67.86.7£220,000400.01
Hybrid Committee ViewHybrid Allocation7.820,301.57.86.8£220,000400.09

Top Ranked Projects

The highest-funded projects per strategy reveal where each rule concentrates the round.

Equal Distribution

CALCIVIS Imaging System

£55,000

Edinburgh Molecular Imaging cancer detection agents

£55,000

NeuroLens

£55,000

Need Adjusted

NeuroLens

£78,669

CALCIVIS Imaging System

£62,577

SynthBioForge

£44,698

Frontier First

SynthBioForge

£57,193

NeuroLens

£55,439

CALCIVIS Imaging System

£54,035

Hybrid Allocation

NeuroLens

£66,327

CALCIVIS Imaging System

£59,254

SynthBioForge

£50,178